University of Baltimore Law Review | Vol 20 | Iss 2

Skip to main content

Home > UBLR > Vol. 20 > Iss. 2

University of Baltimore Law Review

Spring 1991

Articles

University of Baltimore Law Review Volume 20 Number 2 (Spring 1991) Front Matter

Causation in Employment Discrimination Analysis: A Proposed Marriage of the Croson and Wards Cove Rationales
Michael L. Marshall

Competitor Suits against False Advertising: Is Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act a Proconsumer Rule or an Anticompetitive Tool?
Ross D. Petty

Comments: Maryland's Fundamental Interest in a Thorough and Efficient System of Public Education: The Need for Judicial Intervention
Elizabeth Colette Derrrig

Comments: The Right to a Jury Trial in Benefit Recovery Actions Brought under Erisa Section 502(a)(1)(B)
Michael McCabe Jr.

Notes: Constitutional Law — First Amendment Freedom of Speech — Statute Prohibiting "Loud and Unseemly" Noises Is a Content-Neutral Regulation of Protected Speech. Eanes v. State, 318 Md. 436, 569 A.2d 604 (4-3 decision), cert. denied, 110 S. Ct. 3218 (1990)
Richard E. Guida

Notes: Securities Law — Uncollateralized Promissory Notes Are Considered "Securities" to Be Regulated under Federal Securities Laws. Reves v. Ernst & Young, 494 U.S. 56 (1990)
Sheryl N. Stephenson

Select an issue:

Search

Advanced Search

ISSN: 0091-5440

Tweets by UBaltLawReview