University of Baltimore Law Review


Offensive collateral estoppel occurs when a plaintiff estops a defendant from relitigating an issue the defendant has previously litigated and lost. Although this doctrine is accepted by the Supreme Court, its application is limited to situations that would not cause unfairness to the defendant. Recently, the Supreme Court has exempted the government from the application of offensive collateral estoppel for prevailing policy reasons. The author analyzes these decisions and their underlying policies and concludes that a private defendant can fashion an argument that the application of nonmutual offensive collateral estoppel should not be allowed in the second case of a multiple claimant series, even against some private defendant.

Included in

Law Commons



To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.