University of Baltimore Law Review


From their first year in law school through their careers, attorneys have been mystified by the twists and turns of the Erie doctrine and the seemingly incompatible unfolding of what Judge Friendly labeled the "new federal common law. " The author attempts afresh reconciliation through a review of both bodies of law. He concludes that in areas not directly covered by either the Constitution or federal statutes, federal courts are authorized to resolve convicts between federal and state rules through application of a federal procedural common law in much the same way that they have worked to resolve conflicts with state policy in areas offederal substantive concern.

Included in

Law Commons



To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.