Document Type
Article
Journal Title
Cornell International Law Journal
Volume
49
First Page
683
Publication Date
2016
Abstract
Much of the scholarship on war powers looks back on whether U.S. military interventions were authorized, examining the President's powers under Article II of the Constitution, and congressional enactments. That legal question is important, but it does not capture the interactive nature of the dynamic between Congress and the President. This Article instead focuses on the process of dialogue between Congress and the President prior to the exercise of war powers. We examine in detail how that dialogue operates in two recent episodes: the U.S. response to Syrian President Assad's use of chemical weapons in 2013, and the rise of ISIS since 2014. By examining the specifics of how the political branches interact, we can assess whether the exercise of war powers is democratic and legitimate. We see that Congress and the President take part in substantive consultation and dialogue, and through that dialogue, Congress and the public become more informed about the interests at stake and the available options. The nation benefits from war powers dialogue between the two political branches.
Recommended Citation
Charles Tiefer & Kathleen Clark, Congressional and Presidential War Powers as a Dialogue: Analysis of the Syrian and Isis Conflicts, 49 CORNELL INT’L L.J. 683 (2016)(
Included in
Constitutional Law Commons, Military, War, and Peace Commons, President/Executive Department Commons