Casenotes: Antitrust — Clayton Act Section 4 — Standing — Supreme Court Holds That Only Direct Purchasers Have Standing to Bring Treble Damage Suit under Section 4 of Clayton Act. Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois, 431 U.S. 720 (1977)

Authors

William F. Ryan Jr., University of Baltimore School of Law

Recommended Citation

Ryan, William F. Jr. (1978) "Casenotes: Antitrust — Clayton Act Section 4 — Standing — Supreme Court Holds That Only Direct Purchasers Have Standing to Bring Treble Damage Suit under Section 4 of Clayton Act. Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois, 431 U.S. 720 (1977)," University of Baltimore Law Review: Vol. 7: Iss. 2, Article 5.
Available at: https://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/ublr/vol7/iss2/5