Recent Developments: Workmen's Compensation — Evidence — Opinion of Non-Treating Psychiatrist Based on Claimant's Statements Held Inadmissible. Candella v. Subsequent Injury Fund, 277 Md. 120, 353 A.2d 263 (1976)

Authors

Kevin F. O'Neill, University of Baltimore School of Law

Recommended Citation

O'Neill, Kevin F. (1976) "Recent Developments: Workmen's Compensation — Evidence — Opinion of Non-Treating Psychiatrist Based on Claimant's Statements Held Inadmissible. Candella v. Subsequent Injury Fund, 277 Md. 120, 353 A.2d 263 (1976)," University of Baltimore Law Review: Vol. 6: Iss. 1, Article 9.
Available at: https://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/ublr/vol6/iss1/9