Notes: Constitutional Law — Ex Post Facto — Was Adding the Requirement of Gubernatorial Approval of Parole to the Patuxent Institution's Parole Procedures and Reinstating Original Sentences a Violation of the Prohibition against Ex Post Facto Laws? Gluckstern v. Sutton, 319 Md. 634, 574 A.2d 898, cert. denied, 498 U.S. 950 (1990)

Authors

Carolyn W. Evans, University of Baltimore School of Law

Recommended Citation

Evans, Carolyn W. (1992) "Notes: Constitutional Law — Ex Post Facto — Was Adding the Requirement of Gubernatorial Approval of Parole to the Patuxent Institution's Parole Procedures and Reinstating Original Sentences a Violation of the Prohibition against Ex Post Facto Laws? Gluckstern v. Sutton, 319 Md. 634, 574 A.2d 898, cert. denied, 498 U.S. 950 (1990)," University of Baltimore Law Review: Vol. 21: Iss. 2, Article 5.
Available at: https://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/ublr/vol21/iss2/5