Casenotes: Torts — Satisfaction — Release — Where the Terms of a General Release Are Ambiguous with Respect to Whether the Parties Intend to Bar Suit against a Subsequent Negligent Physician, Parol Evidence Is Admissible to Determine the Intent of the Parties at the Time of Execution. Morgan v. Cohen, 309 Md. 304, 523 A.2d 1003 (1987) (4-3 decision)

Authors

Mark Alan Billhimer, University of Baltimore School of Law

Recommended Citation

Billhimer, Mark Alan (1988) "Casenotes: Torts — Satisfaction — Release — Where the Terms of a General Release Are Ambiguous with Respect to Whether the Parties Intend to Bar Suit against a Subsequent Negligent Physician, Parol Evidence Is Admissible to Determine the Intent of the Parties at the Time of Execution. Morgan v. Cohen, 309 Md. 304, 523 A.2d 1003 (1987) (4-3 decision)," University of Baltimore Law Review: Vol. 18: Iss. 1, Article 8.
Available at: https://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/ublr/vol18/iss1/8