Casenotes: Constitutional Law - upon Proof of His Insanity by a Preponderance of the Evidence, Due Process Does Not Require Limiting the Confinement of an Insanity Acquittee to the Hypothetical Maximum Sentence He Could Have Received. Jones v. United States, 103 S. Ct. 3043 (1983)

Authors

Lori Lynn Blair, University of Baltimore School of Law

Recommended Citation

Blair, Lori Lynn (1984) "Casenotes: Constitutional Law - upon Proof of His Insanity by a Preponderance of the Evidence, Due Process Does Not Require Limiting the Confinement of an Insanity Acquittee to the Hypothetical Maximum Sentence He Could Have Received. Jones v. United States, 103 S. Ct. 3043 (1983)," University of Baltimore Law Review: Vol. 14: Iss. 1, Article 9.
Available at: https://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/ublr/vol14/iss1/9