Document Type
Article
Publication Date
10-2001
Abstract
As readers of crime novels know, there are many definitions of the perfect caper. Under most, the perpetrator gets to keep its ill-gotten gains and goes unpunished. Even if the perpetrator is arrested and brought to trial, he or she still typically escapes punishment completely due to a variety of unusual circumstances. This is essentially what Professors John E. Lopatka and William H. Page are arguing about Microsoft's actions. They assert that even though Microsoft has violated the antitrust laws, it will not be made to pay for its anticompetitive conduct, at least not by private plaintiffs.
Recommended Citation
The Perfect Caper?: Private Damages and the Microsoft Case, 69 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 902 (2001)
Included in
Antitrust and Trade Regulation Commons, Computer Law Commons, Consumer Protection Law Commons, Intellectual Property Law Commons