Document Type

Conference Proceeding

Publication Date



University of Baltimore Law librarians do not have a formal role in teaching legal research, but are frequent guest lecturers and recognized research experts. As such, we volunteered to administer UB's first summative assessment in accordance with the recent implementation of ABA Standard 314. This poster shows the steps taken to design, execute, and grade this legal research assessment, as well as how we reported the results to stakeholders.

The assessment had an objective true/false and multiple-choice section, and a subjective essay question. The librarians selected objective questions considering the core legal research competencies identified by RIPS-SIS following the MacCrate Report. The objective questions were loaded into TWEN as a "quiz," and the subjective question was uploaded as an "assignment." We used TWEN to automate grading the objective section. Using a rubric, two librarians graded each subjective essay.

Finally, the library compiled a 55-page report detailing the qualitative and quantitative results. The data showed that classes with regular lectures from librarians did better on the assessment. Consequently, the librarians will teach at least four standardized 75-minute classes to each 1L section in the fall.


This poster was presented at the 2017 Annual Conference for the American Association of Law Libraries in Austin, Texas.

AALL Poster WriteUp Final.pdf (1465 kB)
AALL Poster Report

Procedure memo 1L Research exam.pdf (444 kB)
Step-by-step Procedure Memo



To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.