University of Baltimore Law Review


Analysis of three cases—Harris v. New York, United States v. Calandra and Michigan v. Tucker—reveals a systematic attack by the current Supreme Court on the exclusionary concept in search and seizure and self-incrimination cases. The author examines the Court's treatment of precedent cases and explores the logical framework of the erosion of the exclusionary rule's protections accorded persons accused of crime.

Included in

Law Commons



To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.