Document Type


Journal Title

U.C.L.A. Law Review



First Page


Publication Date



Mixed-income housing is an increasingly popular approach to providing affordable housing. The technique largely went unnoticed until developers of mixed-income housing constructed buildings containing separate entrances for rich and poor residents. The ensuing “poor door” controversy illustrated that mixed-income housing, as both a method of affordable housing production and an integration strategy, is in unacknowledged tension with itself. This Article argues that, mixedincome housing is implemented as a surreptitious form of racial and economic integration that accommodates and replicates prevailing race and class assumptions detrimental to the needs and interests of low to moderate-income individuals in need of housing. The mixed-income housing strategy, at its heart, serves as a form of discrimination management—a way to work around the race and class discriminatory impulses of residents within a development and within a particular jurisdiction. The paper recommends ways in which to think more critically about this important question of community design in ways that account more honestly for the limits and possibilities of how we may choose to use affordable housing for race and class integration.

Included in

Housing Law Commons



To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.