•  
  •  
 
University of Baltimore Law Review

Authors

Abstract

In this paper the author will analyze the reasoning of the Whitaker holding and its ramifications with regard to the federal procedures for authorized electronic eavesdropping as prescribed in Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Acts of 1968. The author concludes that the procedural failing described by the Whitaker court can be corrected by mandatory judicial controls and more stringent post-seizure notification requirements.

Included in

Law Commons

Share

COinS
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.