University of Baltimore Law Review | Vol 14 | Iss 3

Skip to main content

Home > UBLR > Vol. 14 > Iss. 3

University of Baltimore Law Review

Spring 1985

Articles

University of Baltimore Law Review Volume 14 Number 3 (Spring 1985) Front Matter

Bivens Actions for Federal Employees in the Aftermath of Bush v. Lucas: Which Remedies for Whom?
Barry F. Smith

Maryland's Prompt Criminal Trial Provisions: Hicks and Beyond
Harold Douglas Norton

Health Claims Arbitration in Maryland: The Experiment Has Failed
James Kevin MacAlister and Alfred L. Scanlan Jr.

Commments: Putting the House in Order: An Analysis of and Planning Considerations for Home Office Deduction
Mark T. Holtschneider

Commments: Preserving Historic Structures: An Analysis of Regulatory Legislation and Tax Incentives in Federal, Maryland, and Municipal Law
Louis P. Ruzzi

Casenotes: Constitutional Law — Roadside Sobriety Tests May Not Be Administered by Law Enforcement Officials without Probable Cause to Believe the Defendant Was Driving While Intoxicated. People v. Carlson, 677 P.2d 310 (Colo. 1984)
Elena A. Rodney

Casenotes: New Trials — Criminal Procedure — Constitutional Law — New Trial Not Warranted Unless Newly Discovered Evidence Satisfies Threshold Requirement of Materiality to the Outcome of the Case. Stevenson v. State, 299 Md. 297, 473 A.2d 450 (1984)
Nicole Porter

Casenotes: Criminal Procedure — Appellate Review of Sentencing — Sentencing Guidelines — Sentencing Judge's Mistaken Application of Sentencing Guidelines Did Not Require Appellate Court to Vacate Sentence When Sentence Was within Statutory Limits and Was the Result of the Judge's Good Faith Exercise of Discretion. Teasley v. State, 298 Md. 364, 470 A.2d 337 (1984)
Mary Elizabeth Wildemann

Book Reviews: Maryland Rules Commentary
George W. White Jr.

Book Reviews: Sources of Law, Legal Change and Ambiguity
Walter A. Rafalko