University of Baltimore Journal of International Law
Abstract
This article discusses international humanitarian law, particularly the Geneva Conventions and its Additional Protocols. It analyzes the rights of protected persons under the Geneva Conventions, such as prisoners of war and civilians, as well as the obligations of States during armed conflicts. Furthermore, the article points out the flaws in the Geneva Conventions, such as the discrepancy between the obligations of States during an international armed conflict vs. during an internal armed conflicts. It argues that this distinction between international and internal armed conflicts should be eliminated and that States’ obligations should be the same for both conflicts.
Recommended Citation
Chafey, Laura
(2012)
"“Injustice Anywhere is a Threat to Justice Everywhere” Internal vs. International Armed Conflicts: Should the Distinction be Eliminated?,"
University of Baltimore Journal of International Law: Vol. 1:
Iss.
1, Article 5.
Available at:
https://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/ubjil/vol1/iss1/5