•  
  •  
 

University of Baltimore Law Forum

Abstract

The Court of Appeals of Maryland held that a motion to correct an illegal sentence can only be granted if the error is based on substantive law. Colvin v. State, 450 Md. 718, 728, 150 A.3d 850, 856 (2016). Not polling the jury foreperson after she announced the jury's verdicts was a procedural error, and thus not one of the limited exceptions to correct an illegal sentence under Maryland Rule 4-345(a). Id. at 726-27, 150 A.3d at 855-56. In 1989, Roderick Colvin ("Colvin") was tried before a jury in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City on numerous charges, including murder and attempted murder. After jury deliberations, the foreperson announced the verdicts for the jury on each charge, finding Colvin guilty of all charges except for the first-degree murder charge. At defense counsel's request, the clerk polled each juror but failed to individually poll the foreperson. The clerk then hearkened the verdicts and asked if all jurors agreed, to which all jurors, including the foreperson, responded in the affirmative.

Share

COinS
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.