Home > LF > Vol. 45 > No. 2
PDF
University of Baltimore Law Forum Volume 45 Number 2 (Spring 2015) Front Matter
The Duty to Preserve ESI (Its Trigger, Scope, and Limit) & the Spoliation Doctrine in Maryland State CourtsMichael D. Berman
Comment: Retroactivity and the Future of Sex Offender Registration in MarylandTimothy J. Gilbert
Recent Development: Allen v. State: DNA Evidence of a Third Party Found at a Crime Scene Must be Confirmed by Additional Testing to Permit Admission at Trial; Extra Testing Requirement Does Not Violate the Sixth AmendmentGeorge Makris
Recent Development: Brooks v. State: Extrinsic Evidence of a Prior Inconsistent Oral Statement Must Be Verbatim Unless Previously Adopted or Ratified by the Declarant; A Witness’ Statement Suggesting Evidence Corroborated a Complainant’s Story May Be Harmless Error if Not Intended to Imply Truthfulness; Separate Charges Must Be Merged for Sentencing if Not Unambiguously Based on Different ActsStephanie Lurz
Recent Development: Kulbicki v. State: Failure By Defense Counsel to Discover a Relevant Report and Adequately Cross-examine the State’s Forensic Expert is Prejudicial and Constitutes Ineffective Assistance of CounselAllyson Bloom
Recent Development: Raynor v. State: Non-intrusive DNA Testing for the Sole Purpose of Identification is Not a Search Under the Fourth AmendmentBradley T. Bald
Recent Development: Spacesaver Sys., Inc. v. Adam: An Employment Agreement Containing a For-Cause Provision and an Indefinitive Term of Employment is a “Continuous For-Cause” Contract, Not an At-Will Employment ContractPatrick F. Toohey
Recent Development: State v. Johnson: To Warrant an In Camera Review of a Victim’s Mental Health Records, a Defendant Must Offer a Factual Predicate to Show a Reasonable Likelihood That the Records Contain Exculpatory InformationApril L. Inskeep
Recent Development: State v. Payne: Police Officer Needed to be Qualified as an Expert Witness to Testify as to the Function of Cell Phone Towers; Co=Defendants are not a Party Opponents for Hearsay PurposesAllison Terry
Recent Development: Waterkeeper Alliance, Inc. v. Maryland Dep’t of Agric.: A Judicial Decision is Appealable Only if it Constitutes a Final Judgment or if the Decision Falls Within One of the Three Categorical Exceptions Permitting Interlocutory AppealsBrianne Lansinger
Advanced Search
