Recent Developments: McCracken v. State: A Law Enforcement Officer Does Not Violate the Fourth Amendment When He or She Seizes Items Discovered on a Suspect during a Lawful Terry Stop and Frisk if There Is Probable Cause to Believe That the Items Are Contraband or Evidence of a Crime

Authors

Dominic W. Lamartina

Recommended Citation

Lamartina, Dominic W. (2013) "Recent Developments: McCracken v. State: A Law Enforcement Officer Does Not Violate the Fourth Amendment When He or She Seizes Items Discovered on a Suspect during a Lawful Terry Stop and Frisk if There Is Probable Cause to Believe That the Items Are Contraband or Evidence of a Crime," University of Baltimore Law Forum: Vol. 43: No. 2, Article 5.
Available at: https://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/lf/vol43/iss2/5