Recent Developments: Thomas v. State: A Defendant's Subjective Belief That Law Enforcement Officers Had Probable Cause to Arrest Him Does Not Make His Police Station Interview Custodial for Miranda Purposes; Rather, a Totality of the Circumstances Test Is Used to Determine Custody

Authors

Kristine L. Dietz

Recommended Citation

Dietz, Kristine L. (2013) "Recent Developments: Thomas v. State: A Defendant's Subjective Belief That Law Enforcement Officers Had Probable Cause to Arrest Him Does Not Make His Police Station Interview Custodial for Miranda Purposes; Rather, a Totality of the Circumstances Test Is Used to Determine Custody," University of Baltimore Law Forum: Vol. 43: No. 2, Article 10.
Available at: https://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/lf/vol43/iss2/10