Recent Developments: Stoddard v. State: Trial Court's Requirement That the Defendant Testify before the Final Defense Witness Was a Violation of the Constitutional Right to Due Process and Right against Compelled Self Incrimination; It Was Not Error to Admit Evidence of a Defendant's Prior Bad Acts to Rehabilitate a Witness or Permit a Question Implying the Defendant Posed a Threat to a Child to Show a Witness's Motive to Falsify Testimony

Authors

Kayleigh Toth

Recommended Citation

Toth, Kayleigh (2012) "Recent Developments: Stoddard v. State: Trial Court's Requirement That the Defendant Testify before the Final Defense Witness Was a Violation of the Constitutional Right to Due Process and Right against Compelled Self Incrimination; It Was Not Error to Admit Evidence of a Defendant's Prior Bad Acts to Rehabilitate a Witness or Permit a Question Implying the Defendant Posed a Threat to a Child to Show a Witness's Motive to Falsify Testimony," University of Baltimore Law Forum: Vol. 42: No. 2, Article 12.
Available at: https://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/lf/vol42/iss2/12