Home > LF > Vol. 38 > No. 2
PDF
University of Baltimore Law Forum Volume 38 Number 2 (Spring 2008) Front Matter
The Recovery of Stolen Cultural Property in the State of MarylandGillian Flynn
Lloyd v. General Motors Corporation: An Unfortunate Detour in Maryland Products Liability LawRebecca Korzec
Recent Developments: Alavez v. Motor Vehicle Admin.: The Maryland Motor Vehicle Administration May Not Issue a Maryland Driver's License to an Individual Whose License to Drive Has Been Revoked or Is Currently Suspended in Another State, Even Though the Revocation or Suspension Is Permanent in the Other StateSarah Hale
Recent Developments: Anderson House, LLC v. Mayor of Rockville: Comprehensive Zoning Regulations Applied Uniformly and Identically within a Zone Are Valid Even if They Produce Disparate ResultsShantay Clarke
Recent Developments: Barrie School v. Patch: There Is No Duty for a Non-Breaching Party to Mitigate Damages When the Contract Contains a Valid Liquidated Damages ClauseGeorge Perry
Recent Developments: Bednar v. Provident Bank of Md., Inc.: A Closing Cost Reimbursement Charge Was an Invalid Prepayment Charge in Connection with an Earlier Home Loan Featuring a Closing Cost Waiver RepaymentRyan McQuighan
Recent Developments: Holmes v. State: A Defendant Not Incarcerated or on Parole or Probation Who Pleads Guilty but Does Not File Application for Leave to Appeal Waives the Right to Challenge the Conviction and Sentence through Coram NobisGeorge Mowell
Recent Developments: In re Adoption/Guardianship of Rashawn H.: When Terminating Parental Rights Courts Must Make Specific Evidentiary Findings Regarding Each Statutory Factor and Explain Clearly How Those Findings Rebut the Presumption of Maintaining the Parental RelationshipMatthew Hartman
Recent Developments: Macbride v. Pishvaian: The Statute of Limitations on Tenant's Action against Landlord Will Not Be Tolled Unless There Is a Fiduciary Relationship between the Parties or There Are Ongoing Violations of a Potential Plaintiff's RightsTeresa Marino
Recent Developments: Montgomery County v. Glenmont Hills Assocs. Privacy World: Landlords Who Refuse Tenants Solely Because Tenants Intend to Use Section 8 Vouchers Violate Montgomery County's Housing Discrimination Law, Regardless of the Landlord's Lack of Intent to DiscriminatePaul Lamari
Recent Developments: Pee Dee Healthcare, P.A. v. Sanford: Rural Health Care Providers Have a Right to Enforce Medicaid Reimbursement Programs by Suing State Officials Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983Michael Gillman
Recent Developments: State v. Williams: A Traffic Stop Will Be Constitutionally Permissible if It Is Based on Observations of a Police Officer That Give Reasonable Articulable Suspicion That a Traffic Law Has Been ViolatedDavid Jimenez
Recent Developments: Suter v. Stuckey: Parties to a Domestic Violence Protective Order Entered by Consent Do Not Have the Right to an AppealLydia Hu
Recent Developments: United States v. Bly: A University Qualifies as A "Person" under the Extortion Element of 18 U.S.C. § 876(B) and Statements Made Privately to Specific Individuals, That Are Only Grammatically Conditional and Promise Violent Retribution, Are Not Protected under the First AmendmentPatricia Calomeris
Advanced Search
