Recent Developments: Matoumba v. State: A Police Officer Is Not Required to Be Qualified as an Expert Witness to Testify in a Suppression Hearing Regarding Facts That Gave Rise to a Reasonable Suspicion Justifying a Stop and Frisk of a Suspect

Authors

Nancy Chung

Recommended Citation

Chung, Nancy (2006) "Recent Developments: Matoumba v. State: A Police Officer Is Not Required to Be Qualified as an Expert Witness to Testify in a Suppression Hearing Regarding Facts That Gave Rise to a Reasonable Suspicion Justifying a Stop and Frisk of a Suspect," University of Baltimore Law Forum: Vol. 36: No. 2, Article 12.
Available at: https://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/lf/vol36/iss2/12