Recent Developments: Holmes v. State: Under Maryland Rule 5-802.1(b), Prior Consistent Statements Offered to Rebut a Charge of Fabrication Must Precede the Motive to Fabricate

Authors

Adam Cizek

Recommended Citation

Cizek, Adam (1998) "Recent Developments: Holmes v. State: Under Maryland Rule 5-802.1(b), Prior Consistent Statements Offered to Rebut a Charge of Fabrication Must Precede the Motive to Fabricate," University of Baltimore Law Forum: Vol. 29: No. 1, Article 10.
Available at: https://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/lf/vol29/iss1/10