Recent Developments: Rubin v. State: Protection of Attorney-Client Privilege Does Not Apply to Location and Condition of Tangible Evidence Removed or Altered by Defense Counsel Even if It Implicates the Defendant

Authors

Kenneth A. Brown

Recommended Citation

Brown, Kenneth A. (1992) "Recent Developments: Rubin v. State: Protection of Attorney-Client Privilege Does Not Apply to Location and Condition of Tangible Evidence Removed or Altered by Defense Counsel Even if It Implicates the Defendant," University of Baltimore Law Forum: Vol. 22: No. 3, Article 13.
Available at: https://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/lf/vol22/iss3/13